Fair housing issues aren’t just history or headlines from the 20th century – they are very much alive today. In fact, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is actively investigating and enforcing fair housing laws all the time, reaching settlements (called conciliation agreements) and taking legal action when violations occur.
For real estate agents, each case HUD handles is a learning opportunity. What are people still getting wrong? How can we avoid those pitfalls in our own practice? In this article, we’ll summarize a few recent HUD legal actions – real cases from the last few years – and draw out practical lessons for agents. The goal isn’t to scare you, but to show that even in modern scenarios, misunderstandings or missteps with fair housing rules can lead to serious consequences.
By learning from these examples, you can better protect your clients, the public, and yourself. Think of it as a real-world supplement to the theory you might learn in a real estate CE course on fair housing. Let’s dive into the stories and their takeaways.
Case 1: Familial Status – “No Kids Playing Outside” Rules Backfire
What happened: In July 2022, HUD announced a conciliation agreement (settlement) with a California property owner and management company that had been accused of discriminating against families with children archives.hud.gov. Tenants and a local fair housing organization complained that the apartment complex had overly restrictive rules targeting kids.
The allegations included that management prohibited children from playing in common areas – for instance, kids were reportedly not allowed to play on the grass or use the playground freely archives.hud.gov archives.hud.gov. The complex issued a rule that children under 14 must be supervised by an adult at all times when outside, and even threatened to dispose of children’s bikes or toys left in common spaces archives.hud.gov. These rules were enforced only on families with children, suggesting they were being singled out.
Empire Learning is making it easier (and more affordable) to knock out your real estate continuing education. We're offering a 100% FREE CE course to help you get started—no strings attached. Whether you're getting ahead of your renewal or exploring a new topic, this is a perfect way to try out our top-rated online platform.
👉 Enroll now and experience the Empire difference—clear content, flexible access, and support when you need it. Because getting your CE done shouldn’t be a hassle.
HUD saw this as a likely violation of the Fair Housing Act’s protection against familial status discrimination (recall: you can’t treat people differently because they have kids). The case was resolved with a settlement where the housing providers agreed to pay $29,000 total: $8,000 to each of three affected families and $5,000 to the fair housing organization that helped expose the issue archives.hud.gov. They also had to revise their community rules to remove those restrictive policies on kids and implement a fair housing training program for their staff archives.hud.gov. Notably, the owners denied wrongdoing as part of the settlement (which is common – they settle without admitting guilt), but they still have to comply with the agreed terms.
Lesson for agents: Children must be allowed to live and play like anyone else. If you’re involved in managing or selling/renting properties, remember that familial status is protected. This means rules or policies that specifically burden families with kids are suspect. It’s fine to have general safety rules (like “no running in the halls” or quiet hours) as long as they apply to everyone. But “no playing outside” or “children can’t use the gym at certain times” could be illegal unless there’s a very specific safety reason and it’s applied equally.
As an agent, if you are helping a landlord craft lease terms or a condo board with policies, steer them away from anything that effectively bars children from normal activities. Also, in advertising, never say things like “adults only” or “not suitable for children” – those are clear violations.
In this case, the management might have thought they were maintaining order or preventing liability, but they crossed the line into discrimination. The fact that HUD got complaints and took action shows that even somewhat indirect discrimination (rules, not outright denial of housing) is taken seriously. For us, the takeaway is: treat families with kids as you would any other tenant or buyer.
If a property truly isn’t suitable for kids (e.g., a 55+ senior community), it must formally qualify as such under law. Otherwise, any family-friendly property should welcome families. If you ever hear an owner say, “I’d rather not rent to people with kids because of noise/damage,” that’s a big red flag – you should educate them that such a stance is illegal and refuse to enforce any such preference.
Case 2: Racial Bias in Appraisals – A Lender’s Costly Lesson
What happened: In March 2021, an African-American homeowner in Florida filed a complaint about a low home appraisal, and HUD ended up facilitating a conciliation agreement with the bank involved (JPMorgan Chase) fairhousingnc.org. The homeowner was trying to refinance her mortgage, but believed the appraisal she got was unfairly low because of her race.
According to the complaint, when the home was appraised with indications that a Black family lived there (family photos, ethnic decor, etc.), it came in far lower than expected – so low that it jeopardized her refinancing. She suspected bias. Stories like this had been in the news: some minority homeowners conducted experiments where they “whitewashed” their homes (removed personal items) for a second appraisal and saw values jump dramatically. It appears this case had similar overtones.
Rather than go through a protracted fight, the lender agreed to settle. Under the terms, Chase paid $50,000 to the homeowner fairhousingnc.org. They also agreed to implement improved training for their home lending advisors and appraisal staff specifically focusing on the issue of unbiased appraisals and a process called “Reconsideration of Value” fairhousingnc.org. (Reconsideration of Value is basically the method for a borrower to challenge an appraisal they think is wrong – training staff on this ensures they take customers’ concerns seriously and fairly).
Lesson for agents: While appraisals are done by third parties, not by agents, this case is a wake-up call that appraisal bias is real and can violate fair housing laws (race is a protected class). As an agent, if your seller or buyer client faces a “surprisingly” low appraisal that seems out of line with the market, pay attention to any hints of bias. Did the appraiser mention neighborhood demographics? Did they choose very odd comparables that don’t match the home’s features but happen to be in less desirable (perhaps more minority) areas? These could be clues. There’s a fine line: appraisers are professionals and most do their job without bias, but no one is immune to implicit bias.
If you legitimately suspect an appraisal is off, you can help your client with a Reconsideration of Value request. Provide data (better comps, evidence of upgrades, etc.) to the lender to review.
In egregious cases, if there’s evidence the appraiser was influenced by race (for example, comparing the home to others in a “racially similar” area rather than closer/better comps), the buyer or owner could file a fair housing complaint as we saw here.
The lesson is also to be aware of the broader issue: that minority buyers might face hurdles in the loan process beyond just getting approved – the collateral (home value) might be undervalued. As their agent, be supportive and prepared. Advise clients on steps if an appraisal seems fishy.
On the sell side, some agents even suggest that sellers from minority backgrounds consider “neutralizing” their home before an appraisal (removing personal photos, etc.) to prevent any unconscious bias. It’s sad that anyone should have to think about that, but it’s a practical tip that’s arisen from these cases.
Above all, treat appraisal challenges seriously; don’t just say “oh well, the appraisal is the appraisal.” If something doesn’t add up, help your client challenge it through proper channels.
Lastly, keep in mind fair lending laws (which include unbiased appraisals) apply to everyone involved in the lending process. If you happen to also be a mortgage broker or have influence there, note that the Fair Housing Act prohibits considering race in appraisals or lending decisions fairhousingnc.org. Ensuring fairness in property valuation is another piece of the fair housing puzzle.
Case 3: Disability and Assistance Animals – Denying an ESA Leads to Trouble
What happened: A recent HUD case (settled in March 2021) in California highlighted discrimination against a tenant with a disability who needed an emotional support animal fairhousingnc.org. The tenant had a mental health disability and requested to keep an emotional support animal (ESA) in her rental unit as a reasonable accommodation. Instead of granting the request, the housing providers allegedly denied it, canceled her lease, and even changed the locks on her, effectively kicking her out fairhousingnc.org. This is pretty extreme retaliation for simply asking to have a support animal. The tenant was separated from her support animal for months during the dispute, which caused her significant distress.
HUD investigated and found cause to believe discrimination occurred. The case was resolved through a conciliation agreement where the landlords had to pay $10,000 to the tenant fairhousingnc.org (to compensate for the harm caused) and also implement new policies and training. They agreed to create a written reasonable accommodation policy (so they handle future requests properly) and to make sure all their rental documents comply with fair housing law fairhousingnc.org. Plus, their staff had to attend fair housing training.
Lesson for agents: This case is a classic reminder that assistance animals are protected in housing. If you or your client are landlords, you cannot just enforce a no-pets rule blindly when a tenant has an ESA or service animal request. Emotional support animals, while not service dogs, are recognized under fair housing law as a necessary accommodation for many people. HUD takes a firm stance: refusing a valid request for an assistance animal (or worse, punishing someone for asking) is a direct violation of the Fair Housing Act’s disability protections.
As an agent, if you manage properties or represent landlords, know the drill: When a request comes in, engage in a conversation (the “interactive process”). You can ask for documentation if the disability or need isn’t obvious, but you generally should grant the request unless there’s a specific, significant reason not to (like the animal is dangerous or it truly imposes a major hardship, which is rare). Never retaliate by evicting or harassing a person for asking – that will virtually guarantee a finding against you.
On the tenant side, if you’re helping a renter client with a disability, make sure they know their rights. They should request accommodations in writing and provide a doctor’s note if needed.
If a landlord (or listing agent) says “no pets” and your client has an ESA, you can politely inform them that this is a support animal and protected by law. Sometimes landlords just need education. You can even provide HUD’s guidance documents on assistance animals to help the conversation.
We also learn: don’t delay or ignore such requests. In some cases, doing nothing is effectively a denial. It’s better to respond promptly and do the right thing. That $10,000 the landlords paid – plus their legal fees and hassle – could have been entirely avoided if they’d just allowed the support animal.
And in practice, most assistance animals are well-behaved because they’re part of a treatment plan, not random pets. So, from a business perspective, accommodating is usually fine.
Case 4: (Bonus) Familial Status – Refusing to Rent to Families with Kids
(While we’ve covered a familial status case in #1, another noteworthy example underscores straightforward “no kids” discrimination.)
What happened: In early 2021, HUD charged a landlord in Rhode Island with discrimination for allegedly refusing to rent to families with children fairhousingnc.org. This came after a fair housing organization saw an online ad for an apartment that hinted at “student housing” and got suspicious. They sent testers – some posing as parents with a child, others as adults without children.
The testing indicated the landlord was only willing to rent to those without kids. The ones who mentioned a child were told nothing was available or weren’t shown units, whereas testers without kids got tours and encouragement.
HUD found reasonable cause and issued a charge of discrimination. (Charges lead to either a HUD hearing or the parties can choose to go to federal court; often they settle beforehand.)
Result: While I don’t have the final settlement details for this specific charge, typically such cases end up with the landlord having to pay a penalty or damages and agree to cease the discriminatory practice. It’s not uncommon to see a few thousand dollars given to the fair housing organization and any affected individuals, plus mandated training.
Lesson for agents: This one’s simple: Don’t reject or discourage qualified tenants/buyers because they have kids. Even if a property seems “small” or the owner worries about wear-and-tear from children, it’s illegal to make housing decisions on that basis. If you’re a listing agent and your client says “preferably no kids” – you must shut that down and explain it’s against the law. And certainly in advertising, never even subtly suggest an adult-only preference. Terms like “perfect for singles” or “ideal for mature couple” can trigger complaints because they imply families with kids aren’t welcome archives.hud.gov.
This Rhode Island case also highlights that testing is a tool used to catch discrimination. You never know if that email or call inquiry is actually a tester checking if you’ll treat families or people of different backgrounds equally.
The best approach is to always follow the law for everyone – then you never have to worry if it’s a tester or not.
Takeaways for Real Estate Agents
Looking at these cases collectively, a few big themes emerge.
Fair Housing is Actively Enforced
Even in the 2020s, HUD is investigating and reaching settlements on a range of issues – familial status, race, disability, etc. This isn’t theoretical; if you slip up, a complaint could very well be filed. But if you follow best practices, you won’t have to worry.
Policies and Words Matter
It’s not just overt slurs or refusals that get people in trouble. In case #1, it was the house rules; in case #4, an advertisement and differential treatment. So be mindful of the policies you set and the language you use in any professional capacity. Run things through a fair-housing filter: “Could this policy disproportionately affect a protected group? Would I say this phrase in front of a HUD investigator?”
When in Doubt, Seek Guidance
If you or your client are unsure about a situation (e.g., “This tenant wants two cats as ESAs, do I have to allow both?” or “Our apartment has a balcony, can we say no toddlers for safety?”), reach out to fair housing experts or resources before taking action. Many local REALTOR® associations have a hotline, or you can consult HUD’s website or even an attorney. It’s better to take a pause and get it right than to forge ahead and find out later you violated the law.
Education is Prevention
Make sure you stay educated on fair housing. Laws get updated and new guidance comes out (like HUD’s guidance on assistance animals in 2020). By taking regular continuing education – and not just the bare minimum, but really engaging with it – you’ll be better prepared. These case studies we discussed could very well be in a fair housing CE class. In fact, maybe you recognized them from course material if you’ve taken one recently! If not, they might show up in future classes as examples. The more you know, the fewer “oh no, I didn’t realize that was illegal” moments you’ll have. If your brokerage offers fair housing training or refreshers, attend those. Keep reference materials handy (HUD’s fair housing overview, etc.) in case you need to double-check something.
Treat People Fairly and Consistently
The simplest golden rule: treat every client or customer the way you’d want to be treated, and the same as you treat others. Most fair housing violations stem from someone being treated as an exception (usually in a negative way). Create systems for yourself to ensure consistency. For instance, use a standard set of qualifying questions for all rental applicants, a standard process for all buyers (same number of showings or options, etc.), so you have a routine that doesn’t change based on who’s in front of you.
Turning Lessons into Action
Modern fair housing cases show that while blatant discrimination has decreased, subtler forms still persist – sometimes due to ignorance or thoughtlessness. As a real estate professional, you have the power to learn from these incidents and ensure you don’t repeat those mistakes.
Whether it’s advising a landlord client about allowing that emotional support animal or double-checking your MLS remarks to avoid any exclusionary language, the details matter.
Take these lessons to heart: let kids be kids in housing, be vigilant against any racial biases (even in processes like appraisal or lending by partners), and always accommodate disabilities reasonably.
If you do, you’ll not only avoid the unpleasantness of a HUD complaint, but you’ll build a reputation as a trustworthy, inclusive agent.
Remember, fair housing isn’t just a legal duty – it’s a professional and moral one. Every family you help, every individual you treat with respect, is a step toward reversing the injustices of the past and present.
Stay informed (maybe even share these case stories with colleagues in your next office meeting as discussion points), and never hesitate to continue your education. Many online real estate CE programs offer up-to-date fair housing modules that delve into recent cases like these for deeper insight – they can be an easy way to keep sharp.
In short, let the experiences of others guide you: it’s far better to learn about a violation from a distance than to live it firsthand. By internalizing these lessons, you protect your clients, uphold the law, and contribute to a fairer housing landscape. That’s a win-win-win outcome we should all strive for in our daily practice.
To Learn More...
For real estate professionals, understanding these concepts can be particularly valuable during discussions with clients about why REALTORS® and real estate agents are knowledgable professionals.
If you’re preparing for your Real Estate Continuing Education or looking to enhance your knowledge through a Real Estate Course, topics like fair housing and confronting racial discrimination can help set you apart.
As part of your License Renewal Course or other Real Estate CE efforts, staying informed on foundational property concepts can make a big difference in your expertise and client relationships.